Development of Physics Learning Media Integrated with Rebuttal Text  (PhyLeM-ReT) on Work and Energy Material

Lutfi Kurniasih; Achmad Samsudin; Ahmad Aminudin

doi:10.20527/bipf.v13i1.20092

Development of Physics Learning Media Integrated with Rebuttal Text (PhyLeM-ReT) on Work and Energy Material

Lutfi Kurniasih, Achmad Samsudin, Ahmad Aminudin

Abstract

This study aimed to develop Physics Learning Media assisted by Rebuttal Texts (PhyLeM-ReT), integrated with the Predict, Observe, Explain, Apply, and Write (POEAW) model for work and energy material. The development research design employed in this study was ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The participants were 30 tenth-grade students from a private high school in Bandung. A student response questionnaire to the media was implemented, which comprised 19 statements (10 positive and nine negative) and was evaluated using a Likert scale. This study implemented Rasch analysis. The result showed that 25 students agreed with the positive statements and disagreed with the negative statements related to interest in learning physics, the use of media, enthusiasm for learning, and usefulness in understanding concepts. Thus, PhyLeM-ReT integrated with the POEAW model facilitates students' comprehension of energy and work material. The developed media can also serve as an alternative for teachers in teaching, specifically enhancing and transforming students' conceptions. This research is crucial in an era where misconceptions regarding physics persist, as it aims to offer effective alternative learning media that can address these obstacles. Additionally, this research presents opportunities for further development in integrating comparable methods into other subject areas of physics that necessitate a profound conceptual approach.

Keywords

POEAW model; Rasch analysis; Rebuttal texts; Work and energy material

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adimayuda, R., Aminudin, A. H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2020). A multitier open-ended momentum and impulse (MOMI) instrument: Developing and assessing quality of conception of 11th grade sundanese students with rasch analysis. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 4799–4804.

Aminudin, A. H., Adimayuda, R., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Samsudin, A., & Coştu, B. (2019). Rasch analysis of multitier open-ended light-wave instrument (MOLWI): Developing and assessing second-years sundanese-scholars alternative conceptions. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.574524

Bayraktar, S. (2009). Misconceptions of turkish pre-service teachers about force and motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9120-9

Berek, F. X., Sutopo, S., & Munzil, M. (2016). Concept enhancement of junior high school students in hydrostatic pressure and archimedes law by predict-observe-explain strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.6038

Brandt, S., Moulton, M., & Duckor, B. (2015). Advances in rasch modeling : New applications and directions guest editorial. Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling, 57(3), 338–341.

Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). Addressing students’ alternative conceptions on the propagation of periodic waves using a refutational text. Physics Education, 48(5), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/5/657

Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. Instructional Science, 40(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2

Jasdilla, L., Fitria, Y., & Sopandi, W. (2019). Predict observe explain (POE) strategy toward mental model of primary students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 0–6.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022043

Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Zulfa, I., Harizah, Z., & Setyarsih, W. (2018). Validity of student’s misconceptions diagnosis on chapter Kinetic Theory of Gases using three-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-

/1006/1/012005

Jian-Hua, S., & hong, L. (2012). Explore the effective use of multimedia technology in college physics teaching. Energy Procedia, 17, 1897–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.329

Joyce, T. B. Y., & Yates, S. M. (2007). A rasch analysis of the academic self-concept questionnaire. International Education Journal, 8(2), 470–484.

Jubaedah, D. S., Hidayat, S. R., Fratiwi, N. J., Zulfikar, A., Muhaimin, M. H., Bhakti, S. S., Sholihat, F. N., Purwanto, M. G., Setyadin, A. H., Amalia, S. A., Afif, N. F., Kaniawati, I., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2019). Predict, plan, observe, explain and write (PPOEW): A strategy to prevent students’ misconceptions on work and energy topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1204(1), 1–7.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012066

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science Dan Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Kendeau, P., & Broek, P. van der. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577.

Khaerunnisak, K. (2018). Peningkatan pemahaman konsep dan motivasi belajar siswa melalui simulasi physics education tecthnology (PhET). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.109

Leppavirta, J. (2012). Assessing undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding and confidence of electromagnetics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1099–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9317-9

Lim, S. M., Rodger, S., Brown, T., & Rodger, S. (2009). Using rasch analysis to establish the construct validity of rehabilitation assessment tools. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(5), 251–260.

Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19–29.

Luthfiani, T. A., Sinaga, P., & Samsudin, A. (2018). Preliminary development of POEAW in enhancing K-11 students’ understanding level on impulse and momentum. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012053

Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314

Narjaikaew, P. (2013). Alternative conceptions of primary school teachers of science about force and motion. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.503

Nussbaum, M. E., Cordova, J. R., & Rehmat, A. P. (2017). Refutation texts for effective climate change education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.5408/15-109.1

Ozkan, G., & Selcuk, G, S. (2015). The effectiveness of conceptual change texts and context-based learning on students’ conceptual achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(6), 753–763. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.753

Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020111

Poutot, G., & Blandin, B. (2015). Exploration of students’ misconceptions in mechanics using the FCI. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 116–120.

https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-2-2

Preston, C. M. (2019). Effect of a diagram on primary students’ understanding about electric circuits. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1433–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9662-y

Purwanto, M. G., Nurliani, R., Kaniawati, I., & Samsudin, A. (2018). Promoting the hydrostatic conceptual change test (HCCT) with four-tier diagnostic test item. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012035

Purwati, I., Makhrus, M., & Gunada, I. W. (2019). Pengaruh pendekatan konflik kognitif terhadap penurunan miskonsepsi peserta didik pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 278–286.

Putri, N., Samsudin, A., Nugraha, M. G., & Fratiwi, N. J. (2019). The analysis of tenth grade LMM on work and energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052046

Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. USA.

Saglam-Arslan, A., & Devecioglu, Y. (2010). tudent teachers’ levels of understanding and model of understanding about Newton’s laws of motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 11(1).

Salmadhia, F., Rusnayati, H., & Liliawati, W. (2021). Five-tier geometrical optics test feasibility to identify misconception and the causes in high school students. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i2.8874

Samsudin, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Hermita, N., Suhandi, A., Wibowo, F., Costu, B., Akbardin, J., & Supriyatman, S. (2017). Alleviating students’ misconceptions about newton’s first law through comparing pdeode*e tasks and poe tasks: Which is more effective? The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, October, 215–221. www.tojsat.net

Samsudin, A., Rusdiana, D., Efendi, R., Fratiwi, N. J., Aminudin, A. H., & Adimayuda, R. (2021). Development of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Strategy assisted by rebuttal texts on newton’s law material with rasch analysis. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7641

Samsudin, A., Sinaga, P., Luthfiani, T. A., Aminudin, A. H., Rasmitadila, Rachmadtullah, R., Costu, B., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). A reputational texts through POEAW tasks to encourage eleven grade pupils’ conceptual understanding about momentum-impulse. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 3834–3846.

Sudarmini, Y., -, K., & Hadiwijaya, A. S. (2015). Pembelajaran fisika berbasis inkuiri terbimbing dengan menggunakan lks untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari sikap ilmiah siswa madrasah aliyah qamarul huda bagu lombok tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v1i1.4

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi & perubahan konsep pendidikan fisika. Gramedia Widiasrana Indonesia.

Suprapto, N. (2020). Do we experience misconceptions?: An ontological review of misconceptions in science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24

Yilmaz, F. G. K., Özdemir, B. G., & Yasar, Z. (2018). Using digital stories to reduce misconceptions and mistakes about fractions: an action study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 867–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1418919

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v13i1.20092