Tracking Problem-Solving Behavior in One-Dimensional Kinematics: A Study of Physics Education Undergraduates

Suci Rizkina Tari; Fitria Herliana; Fadiya Haya

doi:10.20527/bipf.v14i2.26058

Tracking Problem-Solving Behavior in One-Dimensional Kinematics: A Study of Physics Education Undergraduates

Suci Rizkina Tari, Fitria Herliana, Fadiya Haya

Abstract

A qualitative study was employed to explore undergraduate Physics Education students’ behavior during problem-solving of one-dimensional kinematics. Six undergraduate students from Physics Education program were chosen as the participants. The main data for this research were gathered through the think-aloud technique, which involved recording participants’ verbalizations, transcribing, and coding the data. This analysis was further supported by observations, interviews, and students’ written responses. The study identified twenty-four distinct behaviors commonly exhibited by students when solving problems related to one-dimensional kinematics. These behaviors included initial reading, repeated reading, strategic reading, organizing information, clarifying the problem context, drawing a visual representation, recalling relevant knowledge, identifying the goal, selecting the appropriate formula, identifying the variable, developing the plan, formulating a sub-plan, linking the concept, considering the formula, considering the variable, checking the plan, checking the computation, estimating the answer, recognizing error, evaluating the plan, reflecting on themselves, performing basic calculation, performing algebra, and presenting or writing down the solution. These behaviors were categorized into eight broader groups, which allowed for a clearer interpretation of students' behavior during problem-solving. The eight categories of behavior revealed in this study align with Polya’s four-step problem-solving model and Schoenfeld’s theory of metacognition. The results offer meaningful insights into the ways students interpret, plan, and evaluate solutions to physics problems. The findings also provide important implications for physics education by offering insights that lecturers can use to design learning instruction that explicitly supports the development of students’ problem-solving skills. Future research is suggested to design targeted interventions that support the development of expert-like problem-solving in undergraduate physics education based on the results of this study.

Keywords

Kinematics; Physics education; Problem-solving behavior

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arianto, F., & Hanif, M. (2024). Evaluating metacognitive strategies and self-regulated learning to predict primary school students’ self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in science learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428575

Brooks, J. (2022). The art of problem solving and its translation into practice. BDJ In Practice, 35(9), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-022-1714-y

Bunce, D. M., Gabel, D. L., & Samuel, J. V. (1991). Enhancing chemistry problem‐solving achievement using problem categorization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(6), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280605

Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Diago, P. D., Arnau, D., Arnau-Blasco, D., & González-Calero, J. A. (2024). Metacognitive control during problem solving at early ages in programming tasks using a floor robot. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(6), 1303–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01621-8

Dostál, J. (2015). Theory of problem solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2798–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.970

Eryilmaz-Toksoy, S. (2022). Analysis of strategies used by students in solving motion problems according to the presentation of the problem. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 15(2), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.975348

Evans, E., Bostic, J., & Yee, S. (2025). Productive problem-solving behaviors of students with learning disabilities. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 17(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2024.2396720

González‐pérez, L. I., & Ramírez‐Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Good, M., Marshman, E., Yerushalmi, E., & Singh, C. (2024). The value of using different types of physics problems to help students become proficient problem-solvers. Physics Education, 59(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad097d

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Bowen, G. H. (2014). Fundamentals of Physics. Wiley.

Halmo, S. M., Yamini, K. A., & Stanton, J. D. (2024). Metacognition and self-efficacy in action: how first-year students monitor and use self-coaching to move past metacognitive discomfort during problem solving. CBE Life Sciences Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-08-0158

Hecht, E., & Bueche, J. F. (2006). Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems in College Physics. The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Hitier, M., González-Martín, A. S. (2022). Derivatives and the study of motion at the intersection of calculus and mechanics: A praxeological analysis of practices at the college level. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8, 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00182-z

Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2025). “I think I know it, but I’m not sure”: How pre-service teachers blend conceptual physics problems into solution frameworks. South African Journal of Education, 45(2).

https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v45n2a2352

Kellar, K., & Heron, P. (2025). Distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning approaches: An application of dual-process theories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 10141. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010141

Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Helping students become proficient problem solvers part I: A brief review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020156

Miles, M. B., Hubberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.

Molnár, G., & Greiff, S. (2023). Understanding transitions in complex problem-solving: Why we succeed and where we fail. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101408

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2012-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264190511-en.html.

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). How can adult skills assessments best meet the demands of the 21st century? https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/how-can-adult-skills-assessments-best-meet-the-demands-of-the-21st-century_853db37b-en.html.

Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Changes in students’ problem-solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich, multifaceted problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020102

Ovadiya, T. (2025). Training problem-solving skills by building connections: The case of struggling high school students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2512473

Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416910

Rabiudin, Afifi, E. H. N., Hastuti, T. W., & Nisa, D. C. (2023). Computational thinking skills to solve kinematics problems at high cognitive level cases. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 10955–10964. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5775

Rachmawati, O. Q., Parno, Latifah, E., Wisodo, H., Ghorbiy, B., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2024). Analysis of student problem-solving skills on static fluid topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2866(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2866/1/012104

Rahayuningsih, S., Hasbi, M., Mulyati, M., & Nurhusain, M. (2021). The effect of self-regulated learning on students’ problem-solving abilities. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 927. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3538

Sarkingobir, Y., & Bello, A. (2024). Helping students become proficient physics problem solvers through problem-based learning. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i1.1813

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review. Academic Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Sinaga, B., Sitorus, J., & Situmeang, T. (2023). The influence of students’ problem-solving understanding and results of students’ mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1088556

Sundari, P. D., Azhar, A., & Rahim, F. R. (2023). Identification of kinematics understanding of physics students at the university in coastal area. BIO Web of Conferences, 79. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237905008

Tari, S.R., Haya, F., & Musdar, M. (2025). Profiles of Problem-Solving Strategies in Kinematics : A Comparison Between High, Average, and Low Achieving Undergraduates. Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 18(2), 75–85.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v18i2.6824

Tatira, B. (2024). Undergraduate students’ abstractions of kinematics in differential calculus. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14981

Tschisgale, P., Kubsch, M., Wulff, P., Petersen, S., & Neumann, K. (2025). Exploring the sequential structure of students’ physics problem-solving approaches using process mining and sequence analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 10111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010111

Türkoğlu, H., & Yalçınalp, S. (2024). Investigating problem-solving behaviours of university students through an eye-tracking system using GeoGebra in geometry: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 15761–15791. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12452-1

Wu, T. T., Asmara, A., Huang, Y. M., & Permata Hapsari, I. (2024). Identification of problem-solving techniques in computational thinking studies: Systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249897

Xie, X., & Moss, J. (2025). Task representation and individual differences affect strategy selection and problem-solving performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445200

Yennita, Y., Zulirfan, Z., Irianti, M., Tukan, M. I., Ananda, T., & Naza, K. A. (2023). Preliminary study: Profile of students’ interpretation skills on the topic of kinematics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2509

Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2012). Sears and Zemansky’s University Physics: With Modern Physics. Pearson Education.

Zhang, C., Wang, P., Zeng, X., & Wang, X. (2025). A case study on developing students’ problem-solving skills through interdisciplinary thematic learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1447089

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v14i2.26058