Model-Based Reasoning in the Deductive Laboratory Work with Arduino and Sensor Module
Abstract
Laboratory work that has been applied so far is more dominant in deductive laboratory work, but this type of laboratory work is not optimal in stimulating students' reasoning ability. Up to now, model-based reasoning studies on laboratory work have been substantial (especially in measurement and troubleshooting activities) and have not seen overall laboratory activity, including the use of alternative instrumentation such as Arduino and its sensor module. Designing the best laboratory work requires the role of model-based reasoning studies using Arduino devices. A mixed-method research design was used in this study with a theoretical study to obtain a predictive pattern for deductive laboratory work model which was matched with the observations of 50 undergraduate physics education students in laboratory work. Revision activities were shown by students in laboratory work depending on the capabilities of reasoning. The results of this study indicate that revision activities in deductive laboratory work using Arduino can stimulate students' reasoning. Arduino can lead students to explore their thinking and reasoning to solve problems in laboratory work.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atkin, K. (2016). Using the arduino with makerplot software for the display of resonance curves characteristics of a series lcr circuit. Physics Education, 51(6).
Atkin, K. (2017). Using the arduino with makerplot software for the display of electrical device characteristics. Physics Education, 52(6).
ByBee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunity. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.
Clement, J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Model based learning and instruction in science. Springer.
Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Van De Bogart, K. L., Stetzer, M. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016). Investigating the role of model-based reasoning while troubleshooting an electric circuit. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1).
Espindola, P. R., Cena, C. R., Alves, D. C. B., Bozano, D. F., & Goncalves, A. M. B. (2018). Use of an arduino to study buoyancy force. Physics Education, 53.
Girault, I., D’Ham, C., Ney, M., Sanchez, E., & Wajeman, C. (2012). Characterizing the experimental procedure in science laboratories: A preliminary step towards student’s experimental design. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 825–854.
Hadiati, S., Kuswanto, H., & Rosana, D. (2018). Pengembangan Performance Assesment Pada Mata Kuliah Teknik Laboratorium, 8.
Jacobs, G. J. (2017). Attitudes of pre-service mathematics teachers towards modelling: A south african inquiry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1).
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education: Styles of Scientific Reasoning. Science Education, 101(1), 8–31.
Kubínová, Š., & Šlégr, J. (2015). Physics demonstrations with the arduino board. Physics Education, 50(4), 472–474.
La Rocca, P., Riggi, F., & Pinto, C. (2020). Remotely teaching Arduino by means of an online simulator. Physics Education, 55(6).
Lehrer, R., Horvath, J., & Schauble, L. (1994). Developing model‐based reasoning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(3), 218–232.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.
Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In The Cognitive Basis of Science (pp. 133–153). Cambridge University Press.
Nixon, R. S., Godfrey, T. J., Mayhew, N. T., & Wiegert, C. C. (2016). Undergraduate student construction and interpretation of graphs in physics lab activities. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1).
Nworgu, L. N., & Otum, V. V. (2013). Effect of Guided Inquiry with Analogy Instructional Strategy on Students Acquisition of Science Process Skills, Journal Education and Practice, 4(27), 35–41.
Pereira, N. S. A. (2016). Measuring the rc time constant with arduino. Physics Education, 51(6).
Suari, M. (2017). Pemanfatan arduino nano dalam perancangan media pembelajaran fisika. Natural Science Journal, 3(1), 474–480.
Vosniadou, S. (2013). Model based reasoning and the learning of counter-intuitive science concepts. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 36(1), 5–33.
Wattimena, H. S., Suhandi, A., & Setiawan, A. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat perkuliahan eksperimen fisika untuk meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa calon guru dalam mendesain kegiatan praktikum fisika di sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10(2), 128-139.
Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2017). Developing skills versus reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from a survey of students’ beliefs about experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1).
Zwickl, B. M., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2013). The process of transforming an advanced lab course: Goals, curriculum, and assessments. American Journal of Physics, 81(1), 63–70.
Zwickl, B. M., Hu, D., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2015). Model-based reasoning in the physics laboratory: Framework and initial results. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(2).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i3.8735
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 317 timesPDF - 227 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
The journal has been listed in:
Statistics Counter
1. From August 10, 2016 to present (broken code but the stats is still working)
2. From December 28, 2018 to present (updated stats)
Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License














