The Influence of Dedi Mulyadi’s Populist Leadership Content on Civic Disposition
Abstract
Social media has become a central arena for political communication in the digital era, particularly in constructing leadership images, disseminating political messages, and fostering perceived closeness with the public. Populist leadership content distributed through digital platforms is typically characterized by personal, emotional, and cultural narratives, which have the potential to shape how young people think, behave, and perceive social reality as citizens. In this context, the populist leadership content of Dedi Mulyadi is noteworthy, as it consistently emphasizes proximity to the community, moral storytelling, and the use of strong local cultural symbols, especially those rooted in Sundanese identity. Such strategies are considered effective in building emotional bonds with audiences, particularly students. However, this populist approach also raises concerns, as it may prioritize emotional mobilization over the cultivation of reflective and substantive civic values.This study aims to analyze the influence of Dedi Mulyadi’s populist leadership content on the formation of civic disposition among students of the Faculty of Social Sciences Education (FPIPS), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Specifically, it examines students’ perceptions of mediated intimacy, analyzes the effects of digital directness and performative authenticity on civic disposition, and formulates solutions to address the dominance of emotional appeals in populist content. Employing a quantitative correlational design with a survey method, the findings reveal a significant influence of populist leadership content on students’ civic disposition, indicated by a t-value of 3.702 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, a positive correlation is identified (r = 0.362), suggesting a weak but meaningful relationship. Overall, leadership content that highlights social closeness, public problem-solving, and moral narratives contributes to shaping students’ civic attitudes, while also underscoring the need to strengthen critical.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aji, W. T. (2025). Belajar Demokrasi Dari Kepemimpinan Gubernur Jawa Barat Dedi Mulyadi Pada Periode 2025-2030.
Alfikri, M. (2024). Gaya Komunikasi Budaya Dedi Mulyadi Dalam Mewujudkan Jabar Istimewa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(2), 133–140.
Azis, P., & Dermawan, H. (2025). Telaah Kritis Gaya Komunikasi Kang Dedi Mulyadi dalam Forum Musrenbang Berdasarkan Etika Hukum dan Komunikasi Islam. Bayani, 5(1), 131–147.
Barlian, E. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan kuantittaif. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3(1), 1–15.
Benner, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2023). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. In Handbook of Digital Politics (pp. 287–338). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Berman, S. (2021). The Causes of Populism in the West. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 24(1), 71–88.
Casero-Ripolles, A. (2020). Introduction. In Political Influencers in the Gigital Public Sphere (pp. 171–173). Communication & Society.
Castillo, B. M., Domogen, F. W. L., Alforque, J., Ayson, G. D., Leaño, A. K. E., Mauricio, K. L. D., … Bascon, B. A. D. (2021). The Ripple Effect of Civic Education Empowerment: Unravelling the Pillars of Good Citizenship. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.04.03.302
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth edi). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Dahlgren, P. (2010). Opportunities, Resources, and Dispositions: Young Citizens. International Journal of Learning and Media, 2(1).
Enli, G. (2025). Populism as “truth”: How Mediated Authenticity Strengthes the Populist Message. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 83–99.
Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753.
Gerbaudo, P. (2024). Digital Populism. In Research Handbook on Populism (pp. 506–515). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Guess, A. M., & Munger, K. (2023). Digital Literacy and Online Political Behavior. Political Science Research and Methods, 11, 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.17
Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2020). The Political Economy of Populism. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 753–832.
Hunger, S., & Paxton, F. (2022). What’s in a Buzzword ? A Systematic Eeview of the State of PEopulism Research in Political Science. Political Science Research and Methods, 10, 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44
Hapsah, S., Syaharuddin, S., Rusmaniah, R., Rahmia, S. H., & Triyono, S. (2025). Obstacles to the Implementation of P5 on the Theme of Sustainable Lifestyle in the Green School Program at SMP Negeri 7 Banjarmasin. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 7(1), 195-207.
Jenkins, H. (2020). Convergence Culture. Convergence Culture, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814743683.001.0001
Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(2), 289–296.
Liu, L. (2021). The Rise of Data Politics : Digital China and the World. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56, 45–67.
Maya, P., & Muhajirin. (2015). Pendekatan Praktis Metode Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Etika Jurnalisme Pada Koran Kuning : Sebuah Studi Mengenai Koran Lampu Hijau, 16(2), 39–55.
Mazid, S., Komalasari, K., Abdulkarim, A., Rahmat, R., & Hasanah, I. (2024). Digital-Based comic learning to develop civic disposition. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 19(6), 145–152.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Muetterties, C. (2021). What Kind of Global Citizen? A Framework for Best Practices in World History Civic Education. Education Citizenship and Social Justice, 17(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211038502
Ofstehage, A., Wolford, W., & Jr, S. M. B. (2022). Contemporary Populism and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47(1), 671–696.
Pasandaran, S., Lonto, A. L., Pangalila, T., & Barahama, R. A. (2018). The Efforts of Civic Education Teachers in Strengthening Students’ Civic Disposition. https://doi.org/10.2991/acec-18.2018.14
Quigley, C. N., & Bahmueller, C. (1991). Civitas: A Framework for Civic Education. New York: NCSS Publications.
Roopa, S., & Rani, M. S. (2012). Questionnaire Designing for a Survey. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4), 273–277.
Schulz, W. (2024). Young people’s Trust in Institutions , Civic Knowledge and Their Dispositions Toward Civic Engagement. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12(1), 1–30.
Theocharis, Y., Moor, J. de, & Deth, J. W. Van. (2021). Digitally Networked Participation and Lifestyle Politics as New Modes of Political Participation. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 30–53.
Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Digital political talk and political participation: Comparing established and third wave democracies. Sage Open, 8(2).
Yaddanapudi, S., & Yaddanapuddi, lakshmi narayana. (2019). Basics of CPB. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 49(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA
Yuliyanti, N., Abbas, E. W., Rahmia, S. H., Jumriani, J., & Nur’aini, F. (2025). The Socioeconomic Conditions of Porters at Sudimampir Market Amidst Modernization. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 7(1), 129-138.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/issj.v7i2.17791
Data citation
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Political influencers in the digital public sphere. In Communication and Society (Vol. 33, Issue 2, pp. 171–173). Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.171-173 Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Digital Political Talk and Political Participation: Comparing Established and Third Wave Democracies. SAGE Open, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784986 Enli, g. (2017). Gunn_Enli_Mediated_Authenticity_How_the_Media_Cons. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information Communication and Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 Moffitt, B. (2016). Performance, Political Style, and Representation. http://lccn.loc.gov/2015047453 Dahlgren, P. (2009). ME DI A AN D. Jenkins, Henry. (2008). Convergence culture : where old and new media collide. New York University Press. Mudde, C. , & K. C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Maya, P., & Muhajirin. (2015). Pendekatan Praktis Metode Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Etika Jurnalisme Pada Koran Kuning : Sebuah Studi Mengenai Koran Lampu Hijau, 16(2), 39–55.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
The Innovation of Social Studies Journal (ISSJ) has been indexed and abstracted by:
Managed by:
SOCIAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, LAMBUNG MANGKURAT UNIVERSITY
Jl. Brigadier General H. Hasan Basry, ULM Banjarmasin Campus, Banjarmasin City, North Banjarmasin District, Postal Code 70123, South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia
Journal License:
Journal of The Innovation of Social Studies Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

.png)
