Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Diskusi Berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Berpikir Kritis

Rila Putri Anasty Mellenia, Setyo Admoko

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis serta mengetahui validitas, keparaktisan, dan keefektifan LKPD yang telah dikembangkan. Metode Research & Development (R&D) digunakan dengan model penelitian pengembangan yang digunakan yaitu ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Subjek penelitian yaitu 10 peserta didik kelas XI. Objek penelitian yaitu LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin. Instrumen penelitian antara lain lembar validasi LKPD, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, angket respon peserta didik, serta soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: 1) Validitas LKPD berkategori sangat valid dengan persentase 90%. 2) LKPD yang telah dikembangkan dinyatakan praktis berdasarkan hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran berkategori sangat praktis dengan persentase 88% dan berdasarkan hasil respon peserta didik berkategori praktis dengan persentase 77%. 3) Skor rata-rata N-gain adalah 0,6 berkategori sedang, dapat dikatakan bahwa LKPD efektif dalam meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa LKPD pembelajaran diskusi berbasis pola argumentasi Toulmin untuk melatihkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah dan berpikir kritis dinyatakan valid, efektif, dan praktis, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran fisika kedepannya. Pengembangan LKPD sejenis pada materi fisika dengan karakteristik yang sama dapat dilakukan lagi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan argumentasi ilmiah.

This study aims to develop discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation skills and critical thinking and to know the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the worksheets that have been developed. The Research & Development (R&D) method is used with the development research model adopted, namely ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The object of research is 10 11th students. The research subject is discussion learning worksheets based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern. The research instruments include student worksheets validation sheets, learning implementation observation sheets, student response questionnaires, as well as pretest and post-test questions. The results of this study indicate: 1) The validity of the worksheets is categorized as very valid with a percentage of 90%. 2) Student worksheets that have been developed are declared practical based on the results of observations of the implementation of learning are in the very practical category with a percentage of 88% and based on the results of student responses are in the practical category with a percentage of 77%. 3) The average N-gain score is 0.6 in the medium category, it can be said that the worksheets are effective in improving students' scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills. It can be said that the discussion worksheet based on Toulmin's argumentation pattern to train scientific argumentation and critical thinking skills is declared valid, effective, and practical, so that it can be used in future physics learning. The development of similar student worksheets on physics material with the same characteristics can be done again to improve critical thinking skills and scientific argumentation.

 


Keywords


Argumentasi Ilmiah; Berpikir Kritis; Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik; Pembelajaran Diskusi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Affandy, H., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, S. (2019). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi fluida dinamis di sma batik 2 surakarta. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 25–33. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31608

Aini, N. A., Syachruroji, A., & Hendracipta, N. (2019). Pengembangan lkpd berbasis problem based learning pada mata pelajaran ipa materi gaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 28–34. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/JPD.010.07

Anisah, G. (2021). Kerangka konsep assessment of learning , assessment for learning , dan assessment as learning serta penerapannya pada pembelajaran. Al-Aufa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kajian Keislaman, 03(2), 65–76. https://ejournal.sunan-giri.ac.id/index.php/AL-AUFA/article/view/508/365

Barlenti, I., Hasan, M., & Mahidin. (2017). Pengembangan lks berbasis project based learning untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 5(1), 81–86. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/jpsi

Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). the learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958

Berek, F. X., Sutopo, S., & Munzil, M. (2016). Concept enhancement of junior high school students in hydrostatic pressure anf archimedes law by predict-observe-explain strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.6038

Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(June), 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584

Deta, U. A., & Suprapto, N. (2012). Pembelajaran fisika model diskusi ditinjau dari kecerdasan intrapersonal siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 2(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v2n1.p30-36

Devy, H. C., Puspitawati, R. P., & Yakub, P. (2020). Validitas dan efektivitas lkpd pendekatan toulmin’s argument pattern untuk melatih keterampilan argumentasi. Bioedukasi: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 80–87. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3<287::aid-sce1>3.0.co;2-a

Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187

Ehninger, D. (1960). Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 46(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636009382390

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. In International Journal of Science Education (Vol. 14, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140508

Erduran, Sibel, Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the application of toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Hikmah, N. Z., & Suprapto, N. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran diskusi kelas tipe buzz group untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik kelas x mia materi usaha dan energi. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 608–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v8n2.p%25p

Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa bebasis pola toulmin’s argument pattern (tap) menggunakan model argument driven inquiry dan diskusi pada pembelajaran fisika sma. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(03), 318–324.

Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171

Laksana, D. N. L., Lawe, Y. U., Ripo, F., Bolo, M. O., & Dua, T. D. (2020). Lembar kerja siswa berbasis budaya lokal ngada untuk pembelajaran tematik siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 5(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v5i2.13903

Mahjatia, N., Susilowati, E., & Miriam, S. (2021). Pengembangan lkpd berbasis stem untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses sains siswa melalui inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 4(3), 139. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v4i3.2055

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Phan, H. P. (2010). Critical thinking as a self-regulatory process component in teaching and learning. Psicothema, 22(2), 284–292. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20423634

Rahayu, Risnitas, & Effendi, M. H. (2020). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (lkpd) berpola claim, data, warrant (cdw) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi siswa kelas xi sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 3(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1790

Rahmayanti, N., Muntari, M., & Siahaan, J. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran diskusi kelas dengan teknik buzz group terhadap prestasi belajar siswa kimia materi pokok hidrokarbon. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 9(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v9i1.41

Rosdiana, S. R., Sutopo, & Kusairi, S. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sma pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 731–737. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/11672

Salirawati, D. (2006). Penyusunan dan kegunaan lks dalam proses pembelajaran. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id

Salsabela, A. I. (2020). The validity of student worksheets based on argument-driven inquiry (adi) in cell structure and plant tissue material to train critical thinking skill for senior high school students. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 9(2), 302–309. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu

Sari, R. P., Sakti, I., & Hamdani, D. (2021). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (lkpd) fluida statis dengan scientific approach untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa sman kota bengkulu. DIKSAINS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksains.v1i1.14692

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suraya, S., Setiadi, A. E., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2019). Argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui metode debat. Edusains, 11(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10479

Wati, R. T., & Yuliani. (2020). Pengembangan lembar kegiatan peserta Didik (LKPD) berbasis problem based learning (PBL) submateri transpor membran untuk melatih keterampilan berpikir kritis. BioEdu Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 340–349. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:


Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a creative commons attribution-share alike 4.0 international license

Statistics Counter 

View My Stats