Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

  1. Research of Biology Education
  2. Development of Biology Learning Designs
  3. Development of Biology Education Evaluation Tools
  4. Development of Biological Media

Special rules for development research or research and development, at least the research stage is up to small group evaluation with clear evidence of product implementation. We do not accept those types of research that only reach the structural validity test.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Frequency

Since 2021, the BIO-INOVED journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October).


Publication Ethics

The Bio-Inoved Journal is a peer-reviewed journal following the guidelines of the Publications Ethics Committee (COPE) in publication ethics regarding research cases and publication violations. This statement regulates the ethical behaviour of all parties in this journal's publishing articles, including writers, chief editors, managing editors, editor members, reviewers, and publishers (Lambung Mangkurat University Press). Prevention of unethical publication practices is one of the important responsibilities of the editorial board. Journals do not tolerate forms of unethical behaviour and plagiarism in any form. The ethics of publication in this journal need to be clearly understood to improve the quality of research. This section explains the standards for editors, writers, and reviewers. The publisher doesn't have the right to interfere with the contents' integrity and only supports publishing on time.

A. For Editors

  1. Based on the review report from the editorial review board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript.
  2. The editor is responsible for each article published in the Bio-Inoved Journal.
  3. The editor can communicate with other editors or reviewers in making the final decision.
  4. An editor must evaluate the manuscript objectively for publication, assessing each on its quality regardless of nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the author. He must refuse his duties when there is a potential conflict of interest.
  5. The editor needs to ensure the documents sent to reviewers do not contain information from the author and vice versa.
  6. The editors 'decision must be made known to the author, accompanied by the reviewers' comments, unless they contain offensive or defamatory comments.
  7. The editor must respect the request from the author that one must not review the post if this is reasonable and practical.
  8. The editor and all staff must ensure the confidentiality of the text submitted.
  9. The editor will be guided by the COPE flow chart if there is a suspected violation or disputed authorship.

B. For Reviewers

  1. Reviewers must comment on ethical questions and possible violations of research and publication.
  2. Reviewers will do the work on time and must notify the editor if they cannot complete the work.
  3. Reviewers need to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
  4. Reviewers may not accept to review texts with a potential conflict of interest between them and any writer.

C. For Authors

  1. The authors confirm that the material has never been published before. Besides, they have not transmitted the rights to the article anywhere.
  2. Authors must ensure the work's authenticity and have quoted other people's work well following the reference format.
  3. Authors must not be involved in plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  4. Authors must ensure that they follow the authorship criteria taken from the Bio-Inoved Journal described in the instructions for the Bio-Inoved Journal authors.
  5. Authors may not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously. It is also hoped that the author will not publish excessive manuscripts or manuscripts that describe the same research in more than one journal.
  6. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the research reported's conception, design, implementation or interpretation. Others who have made significant contributions must be registered as joint authors. The author also ensures that all authors have seen and agreed to the manuscript version and include their names as joint authors.
  7. Authors haven't suggested any personal information that can make a patient's identity identifiable in all forms of description, photo or genealogy sections.
  8. Authors must provide a data editor and job details if there is a suspicion of data forgery or fabrication.
  9. If, at any time, the writer finds a significant error or inaccuracy in the text submitted, then the corresponding author must report the error or inaccuracy to the editor.
  10. In document B, journal writers must clarify anything that can cause conflicts of interest, such as employment, research fees, consular fees, and intellectual property.

PDF Version (Indonesia)


Plagiarism Check

The scientific article submitted to the Bio-Inoved Journal will start with a plagiarism check using Turnitin software, with maximum plagiarism of 20%. Plagiarism includes vocabulary or ideas used by other writers without clearly mentioning the source; the creation of new works from previous publications has no meaningful change, meaning there is nothing novelty from the old issues.


Peer Review Process

BIO-INOVED Journal implements the Double-Blind Peer Review process. The Editor in Chief will assign the manuscript to a corresponding Section Editor for further handling. The Section Editor will request at least two Reviewers to review the manuscript. Based on the comments from the Reviewers, the Section Editor and Editor Chief will decide on the manuscript.