.png)
.png)
Are scientific literacy and students’ environmental attitudes on ecosystem materials and environmental change correlated?
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between scientific literacy and students' environmental attitudes. Data were collected using a survey method with scientific literacy test instruments and environmental attitude questionnaires. The research samples are 123 students of MAN 1 Kuantan Singingi, Riau. Data were analyzed using Spearman's Correlational test. The results of research for student scientific literacy in three indicators get an average score 65.5 for indicators explaining scientific phenomena, 60 for indicators of scientific design and evaluation and 83.6 for indicators of data interpretation and scientific facts. The results of students' environmental attitudes on the four indicators get an average of 3.9 and 3.7. The results of the correlation test shown that the correlation coefficient of scientific literacy and environmental attitudes is 0.850 > 0.05, which is not correlated. Based on this research, it can be explained that 1) the overall scientific literacy of students is in the moderate category 2) the overall environmental attitude of students is in the high category and 3) There is no correlation between students' scientific literacy and environmental attitudes. Pros and cons were found between the results of this study and previous studies. Further, broader research is needed to explore the causes of these differences, and to state their impact on education in the future.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara literasi sains dan sikap lingkungan siswa. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survei dengan instrumen tes literasi sains dan angket sikap lingkungan. Sampel penelitian merupakan 123 siswa MAN 1 Kuantan Singingi, Riau. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Korelasional Spearman. Hasil penelitian untuk literasi sains siswa pada tiga indikator mendapatkan rerata sebesar 65,5 untuk indikator menjelaskan fenomena saintifik, 60 untuk indikator desain dan evaluasi saintifik dan 83,6 untuk indikator interpretasi data dan fakta saintifik. Hasil sikap lingkungan siswa pada empat indikator mendapatkan rerata sebesar 3,9 dan 3,7. Hasil uji korelasi menunjukkan koefisien korelasi literasi sains dan sikap lingkungan sebesar 0,850 > 0,05, yaitu tidak berkorelasi. Berdasarkan penelitian tersebut dapat dijelaskan bahwa 1) Literasi sains siswa secara keseluruhan berada pada kategori sedang 2) Sikap lingkungan siswa secara keseluruhan berada pada kategori tinggi dan 3) Hasil uji korelasi menunjukkan tidak ada hubungan antara literasi sains siswa dan sikap lingkungan. Ditemukannya pro dan kontra antara hasil penelitian ini dengan penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya. Diperlukan penelitian lanjutan lebih luas untuk menelisik penyebab perbedaan tersebut, dan menyatakan dampaknya bagi pendidikan di masa depan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aminrad, Z., Zakariya, S. Z. B. S., Hadi, A. S., & Sakari, M. (2013). Relationship between awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards environmental education among secondary school students in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(9), 1326-1333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.22.09.275
Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students' digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613
Berque, A. (2005). A basis for environmental ethics. Diogenes, 52(3), 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192105055165
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.518644
Chen, X., Peterson, M.N., Hull, V., Lu, C., Lee, G.D., Hong, D., & Liu, J. (2011). Effects of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on pro-environmental behavior in urban China. Environmental Conservation, 38(1), 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291000086X
Feucht, F.C., Lunn Brownlee, J., & Schraw, G. (2017). Moving beyond reflection: Reflexivity and epistemic cognition in teaching and teacher education Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 234–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1350180
Flores, C. (2018). Problem-based science, a constructionist approach to science literacy in middle school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 25–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.001
Forbes, C.T., Neumann, K., & Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2020). Patterns of inquiry-based science instruction and student science achievement in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 783–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1730017
Gökmen, A. (2021). The effect of gender on environmental attitude: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 243–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2021167799
Gustria, A., & Fauzi, A. (2019, April). Analysis of high school students’ environmental attitude. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012079). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012079
Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Rao, A. (2022). socioscientific issues thinking and action in the midst of Science-in-the-Making. Science & education, 31, 1105-1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00306-y
Jahan, S., Munni, S., & Ghosh, G.C. (2016). Noise pollution at major schools, colleges and hospitals in small urban areas: Focusing on Jessore municipality, Bangladesh. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 15(3), 1089–1094. Retrieved from https://neptjournal.com/upload-images/NL-57-49-(47)D-476.pdf
Karakaya, F., & Yilmaz, M. (2017). Environmental ethics awareness of teachers. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 105–115. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180991.pdf
Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D.L. (2016). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
Kawamoto, S., Nakayama, M., & Saijo, M. (2011). A survey of scientific literacy to provide a foundation for designing science communication in Japan. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 674–690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511418893
Keskin, S.C., Özcan, G., Topsakal, U.U., & Kaplan, A.O. (2013). Students’ cognitive awareness about the reasons of environmental problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(3), 378–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.28.03.765
Lin, T.J. (2021). High school students' epistemic knowledge profiles and their multifaceted learning engagement in science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 39(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1985446
Liu, P., & Zeng, R. (2017). Age diversity and corporate social responsibility—Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236 /jss.2017.54001
Lucena, F.J.H., Díaz, I.A., Reche, M.P.C., Torres, J.M.T., & García, G.G. (2019). Analysis of further education students' attitudes regarding environmental pollution. A case study in Granada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060905
Mcdaniel, C., Veledar, E., & Roche, JK (2011). Ethics environment in long-term care. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30(1), 67–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464810361464
Mustikasari, V.R., Yulianti, E., Pratiwi, N., Hidayat, A., Pryadiani, A.K., & Phang, F.A. (2020, April). The implementation of PjBL-STEM model to improve eight graders’ scientific literacy. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 040009). AIP Publishing LLC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000635
OECD. (2009). Take the test sample questions from OECD's pisa assessments. In OECD Publishing (Ed.), Pit and Quarry (Vol. 90, Issue 2). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Take the test e book.pdf
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 released field trial cognitive items. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf
Otsuka, K., Nakamura, K.W., Hama, Y., & Saito, K. (2018). The creation of learning scales for environmental education based on existing conceptions of learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(11), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114168
Pineda Pinto, M. (2020). Environmental ethics in the perception of urban planners: A case study of four city councils. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2850–2867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019887932
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Riduwan, R., & Kuncoro, E.A. (2007). Cara menggunakan dan memaknai analisis jalur (path analysis). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Setyaningsih, S., & Sariningrum, A. (2019, June). Using socio-scientific issues in problem based learning to enhance science literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1233, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012073
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 1-9). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1
Razak, S.A.A., Kamarudin, M.K.A., Toriman, M.E., Wahab, N.A., Saad, M.H.M., & Bati, M. (2019). Relationship between knowledge and attitudes towards environmental education among secondary school students in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(12), 37-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i12/6664
Tamara, R.M. (2016). Peranan lingkungan sosial terhadap pembentukan sikap peduli lingkungan peserta didik di SMA Negeri Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 16(1), 44-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v16i1.3467
Wilsa, A. W., Susilowati, S. M. E., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Problem based learning berbasis socio-scientific issue untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan komunikasi siswa. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(1), 129-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i1.17072
Safitri, W.I., Suryawati, E., & Yustina, Y. (2020). Environmental literacy analysis of junior high school students in Pekanbaru. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 116-123. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.1.p.116-123
Wulandari, I.A.I., Muhdhar, M.H.I.A., Mardiyanti, L., Triani, L., & Purwanti, W.C. (2021, March). The relationship between knowledge and attitude towards students’ behaviour in environmental literacy. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1, p. 030007). AIP Publishing LLC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043110
Yassin, M.F., Almutairi, H., Alhajeri, N., Al-Fadhli, F., Al Rashidi, M.S., & Shatti, T. (2016). Assessment of noise exposure and associated health risk in school environment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(8), 2011–2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1035-y
Yaumi, Y., & Taufikurohmah, T. (2019). Development of science learning material with socio-scientific issues (ssi) on climate change materials to improve science literacy of junior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 56-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v4n2.p56-63
Yuliastini, I.B., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2016). POGIL context of socio scientific issues (ssi) and science literacy for vocational high school students. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA (Vol. 1, pp. 601-614), Universitas Negeri Malang. Retrieved from https://pasca.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Ika-Budi-601-614.pdf
Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., & Gofur, A. (2019). The potential of RICOSRE's learning model in improving cognitive learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(2), 51-57. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jps.v7i2.12572
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bino.v4i3.14026
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 694 timesPDF - 428 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
BIO-INOVED Journal has been Accredited:
|
BIO-INOVED Journal has been Indexed/Abstracted/Listed by:
|
Managed by: |
Collaborate with: |
Journal License: |
