.png)
.png)
Group investigation inquiry online learning model for empowering students' metacognitive abilities and creative thinking
Abstract
Numerous educational models have been developed to enhance students' aptitudes in online learning. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the effect of the group investigation inquiry online learning model (GINO) on the metacognitive and creative thinking abilities of students in Senior High Schools (SHS) in Ambon, Indonesia. The method employed a pretest-posttest control group design, with a sample comprising 116 students from Senior High Schools 1, 4, and 12 Ambon. Validity and reliability tests were also conducted to measure metacognitive abilities and creative thinking. Furthermore, the data analysis encompassed descriptive and inferential approaches, employing ANCOVA. The results showed that the GINO learning model effectively enhances the metacognitive abilities and creative thinking of SHS students in Ambon (p=0.000<α=0.05). To foster a distinct online learning environment, the model was subjected to modifications in its learning stages through the integration of the group investigation learning model and inquiry strategies, providing valuable variations in the learning process. This research contributes to showing how varied learning is very important in providing a more interesting learning climate compared to conventional learning carried out by teachers and this learning model can be applied to other concepts in learning.
Abstrak. Berbagai model pembelajaran telah dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam pembelajaran daring. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran group investigation inquiry online (GINO) terhadap kemampuan berpikir metakognitif dan kreatif siswa pada Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) di Ambon, Indonesia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan desain kelompok kontrol pretest-posttest, dengan sampel yang terdiri dari 116 siswa dari SMA 1, 4, dan 12 Ambon. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas juga dilakukan untuk mengukur kemampuan metakognitif dan berpikir kreatif. Selanjutnya, analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferensial, dengan menggunakan ANCOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran GINO secara efektif meningkatkan kemampuan metakognitif dan berpikir kreatif siswa SMA di Ambon (p=0.000<α=0.05). Untuk menumbuhkan lingkungan belajar online yang berbeda, model ini mengalami modifikasi dalam tahapan pembelajarannya melalui integrasi model pembelajaran investigasi kelompok dan strategi inkuiri, sehingga memberikan variasi yang berharga dalam proses pembelajaran. Penelitian ini berkontribusi untuk menunjukkan bagaimana pembelajaran yang bervariasi sangat penting dalam memberikan iklim pembelajaran yang lebih menarik dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran konvensional yang dilakukan oleh guru dan model pembelajaran ini dapat diterapkan pada konsep-konsep lain dalam pembelajaran.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adiansyah, R., Amin, A. M., Ardianto, A., & Yani, A. (2022). Metacognitive skill profile of biology education students at institute of teachers’ education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(2), 150–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732
Alharbi, S. M., Elfeky, A. I., & Ahmed, E. S. (2022). The effect of e-collaborative learning environment on development of critical thinking and higher order thinking skills. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 6848–6854. Retrieved from http://184.168.115.16/index.php/jpsp/article/view/8692
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive argument-driven ınquiry in teaching antimicrobial resistance: Effects on students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
Arinda, Y., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The application Group Investigation (GI) learning model assisted phet to facilitate student scientific work skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 254-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518069
Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2019). The effectiveness of inquiry learning model in improving prospective teachers’ metacognition knowledge and metacognition awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 455-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12229a
Bae, H., & Kwon, K. (2021). Developing metacognitive skills through class activities: what makes students use metacognitive skills?. Educational Studies, 47(4), 456–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1707068
Baharom, M. M., Atan, N. A., Rosli, M. S., Yusof, S., & Hamid, M. Z. A. (2020). Integration of science learning apps based on inquiry based science education (IBSE) in enhancing students science process skills (SPS). International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(9), 95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i09.11706
Bozorgian, H., Sabokpa, M., & Muhammadpour, M. (2022). Dialogic interaction and dynamic systems theory in listening comprehension: A case study of metacognitive interventions. Ampersand, 9(October), 100088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100088
Bruckermann, T., Aschermann, E., Bresges, A., & Schlüter, K. (2017). Metacognitive and multimedia support of experiments in inquiry learning for science teacher preparation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 701–722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1301691
Cai, Y., Pan, Z., Han, S., Shao, P., & Liu, M. (2022). The impact of multimodal communication on learners' experience in a synchronous online environment: A mixed-methods study. Online Learning, 26(4), 118-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3448
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 Countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
Capobianco, L., & Nordahl, H. (2023). A brief history of metacognitive therapy: From cognitive science to clinical practice. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 30(1), 45–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.11.002
Chou, R. J., Liang, C. P., Huang, L. Y., & She, H. C. (2022). The impacts of online skeuomorphic physics inquiry–based learning with and without simulation on 8th graders’ scientific inquiry performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 357-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09960-5
Corebima, A. (2008). Review on: Learning strategies having bigger potency to empower thinking skill and concept gaining of lower academic students. In Proceedings of The Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge, and Understanding, Singapore, (pp. 28-30).
Corebima, A. D. (2009, November). Metacognitive skill measurement integrated in achievement test. In Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (CoSMEd), (Vol. 5, No. 1). Penang: SEAMEO Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics.
Daud, N. M. (2017). Integrating HOTS into language classes in the 21st century. In Proceedings Education and Language International Conference, (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 29–36). Retrieved from https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ELIC/article/view/1208
Dewi, C. A., & Mashami, R. A. (2019). The effect of chemo-entrepreneurship oriented inquiry module on improving students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Turkish science education, 16(2), 253-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10279a
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning : A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Divrik, R., Pilten, P., & Taş, A. M. (2020). Effect of inquiry-based learning method supported by metacognitive strategies on fourth-grade students’ problem-solving and problem-posing skills: A mixed methods research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 287–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.191
Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., Koehler, M. J., Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 131–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364
Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic literature review on the elements of metacognition-based higher order thinking skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules. Sustainability, 14(2), 813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813
Heard, J., Krstic, S., & Richardson, S. (2023). Evidencing creativity in educational settings. Journal of Creativity, 33(1), 100046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100046
Holzapfel, M. A., Jaggy, A. K., & Brückmann, M. (2022). Creativity in German science education in elementary schools: Preservice teachers’ perspective on whether it is essential, possible or completely unnecessary. Creative Education, 13(4), 1421-1438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.134087
Jamaluddin, A. B., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Bahri, A. (2023, January). SIRI (stimulation, investigation, review, and inference) learning model to promote creative thinking. In AIP Conference Proceedings, (Vol. 2569, No. 1, p. 020020). AIP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112382
Kralik, J. D., Lee, J. H., Rosenbloom, P. S., Jackson Jr, P. C., Epstein, S. L., Romero, O. J., ... & McGreggor, K. (2018). Metacognition for a common model of cognition. Procedia computer science, 145, 730-739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.046
Kuklick, L., Greiff, S., & Lindner, M. A. (2023). Computer-based performance feedback: Effects of error message complexity on cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational outcomes. Computers and Education, 200(October 2022), 104785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104785
Kuo, H. C., Tseng, Y. C., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.09.001
Li, M., & Yuan, R. (2022). Enhancing students’ metacognitive development in higher education: A classroom-based inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101947
Li, S., de Ala, M., Mao, D., Wang, A., & Wu, C. (2022). Effect of a nursing comprehensive skill training course (NCST-C) on nursing students’ metacognitive awareness: A quasi-experimental study. Asian Nursing Research, 16(5), 275–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2022.10.003
Liu, Y., He, W., & Zhao, L. (2022). Effects of inquiry learning with different task orders on fifth graders’ individual and situational interest and concept achievement in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(5), 849–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.849
Lu, K., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2021). Understanding the mediating effect of learning approach between learning factors and higher order thinking skills in collaborative inquiry-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2475–2492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10025-4
Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695
Maspupah, M., Muhlas, M., Rahmawati, D., Alawiyah, R. N., Juniardi, H., & Nurlaela, A. A. (2021, March). Student creative thinking skills of environmental change material using group investigation learning model with interactive multimedia. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, (Vol. 1098, No. 5, p. 052078). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1098/5/052078
Mekern, V., Hommel, B., & Sjoerds, Z. (2019). Computational models of creativity: A review of single-process and multi-process recent approaches to demystify creative cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.008
Michalopoulou, A. (2014). Inquiry-based learning through the creative thinking and expression in early years education. Creative Education, 5(6), 377–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.56047
Morris, D. L. (2024), Reflections of a first-year chemistry teacher: Intersecting PCK, responsiveness, and inquiry instruction. Education Sciences, 14(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010093
Ningsih, S. R., Suryani, A. I., & Maulana, I. T. (2022). The implementation of group investigation e-task in activities learning (GIETAL) in higher education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(2), 120-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.2.2066
Omarchevska, Y., Lachner, A., Richter, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). Do video modeling and metacognitive prompts improve self-regulated scientific inquiry?. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1025-1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09652-3
Pattipeilohy, M., Rumahlatua, D., Salmanua, S. I., & Sangur, K. (2022). The inquiry investigation group learning model: Improving students' critical thinking skills, cognitive learning outcomes, and scientific attitudes. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 205-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.22113
Paudel, P. (2021). Online education: Benefits, challenges and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 3(2), 70-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.32
Pearman, A., Lustig, E., Hughes, M. L., & Hertzog, C. (2020). Initial evidence for the efficacy of an everyday memory and metacognitive intervention. Innovation in Aging, 4(6), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa054
Perdana, R., Rudibyani, R. B., Budiyono, B., Sajidan, S., & Sukarmin, S. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry social complexity to improving critical and creative thinking skills of senior high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 477-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13430a
Ramdani, D., Susilo, H., Suhadi, S., & Sueb, S. (2022). The effectiveness of collaborative learning on critical thinking, creative thinking, and metacognitive skill ability: Meta-analysis on biological learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1607–1628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607
Rashwan, Z. I., Busebaia, T. J., AL-Sabbagh, A. S., & Eweida, R. S. (2021). Effect of guided reciprocal peer questioning strategy on pediatric nursing students’ self-esteem and metacognitive awareness: Current approach and future directions. Nurse Education Today, 107, 105153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105153
Ritter, S. M., Id, X. G., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PLoS ONE, 15(3), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773
Rumahlatu, D., Sangur, K., & Liline, S. (2020). The effect of complex instruction team product (CITP) learning model on increase student’s skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 587–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13138a
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sojayapan, C., & Khlaisang, J. (2018). The effect of a flipped classroom with online group investigation on students' team learning ability. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.02.003
Suartama, I., Triwahyuni, E., Abbas, S., Hastuti, W. ., Usman, M., Subiyantoro, S., Umar, & Salehudin, M. (2020). Development of e-learning oriented inquiry learning based on character education in multimedia course. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1591–1603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1591
Suwono, H., Susanti, S., & Lestari, U. (2017, March). Guided inquiry facilitated blended learning to improve metacognitive and learning outcome of high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (Vol. 824, No. 1, p. 012068). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Tate, T., Warschauer, M., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
Tegeh, I. M., Santyasa, I. W., Agustini, K., Santyadiputra, G. S., & Juniantari, M. (2022). Group investigation flipped learning in achieving of students’ critical and creative thinking viewed from their cognitive engagement in learning physics. Journal of Education Technology, 6(2), 350–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i2.44417
Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving student creative thinking skills through project based learning. KnE Social Sciences, 3(18), 408–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i18.4732
Yildiz, C., & Yildiz, T. G. (2021). Exploring the relationship between creative thinking and scientific process skills of preschool children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795
Yun, G. K. (2024). A study on teaching plans for music creation applying generative AI based on ‘text to music’ to group investigation model. Korean Music Education Society, 53(1), 143–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30775/kmes.53.1.143
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bino.v7i1.20806
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 280 timesPDF - 162 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
BIO-INOVED Journal has been Accredited:
|
BIO-INOVED Journal has been Indexed/Abstracted/Listed by:
|
Managed by: |
Collaborate with: |
Journal License: |
