Development of Learning Outcome Test Instruments on Thermodynamics and Waves Based on The Demands of Basic Competencies

Abdul Haris; Khaeruddin Khaeruddin; Sri Reski

doi:10.20527/jipf.v8i1.10217

Development of Learning Outcome Test Instruments on Thermodynamics and Waves Based on The Demands of Basic Competencies

Abdul Haris, Khaeruddin Khaeruddin, Sri Reski

Abstract

Evaluation is a process of determining the results of a learning activity that has been conducted using instruments. This development research aims to develop test instruments for physics learning outcomes that meet valid and reliable criteria. The tests developed were multiple-choice tests in the form of physics material based on the 2013 curriculum, such as thermodynamics and mechanical waves. This research is a research and developmental project that uses the development method according to Djaali and Mulyono, which generally has seven steps: (1) formulating conceptual and operational definitions, (2) designing instruments, (3) reviewing statements, (4) testing, (5) analysis, (6) revising instruments, and (7) instrument assembly into the final instrument. The study's results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel, analyzing the items' validity, reliability, difficulty level, and differentiability level. Validity using the biserial point coefficient, reliability using Kuder Richardson 20, difficulty level using the simple proportion of correct answers, and differentiability using high groups. The research results indicate that the physics learning outcomes test meets valid and reliable criteria. The valid question items were 33 items, and the reliability of the instrument in the first test was 0.77, and in the second test was 0.81. Teachers can use the developed instrument to assess students' learning outcomes because it remains consistent after testing on the same subjects and conditions.

Keywords

instruments; learning outcome; physics

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali, S., & Khaeruddin. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Badan Penerbit UNM Makassar.

Ani, Y. (2018). Penilaian autentik dalam kurikulum 2013. Seminar Nasional Implementasi Kurikulum 2013, 742–749.

Amelia, M. A. (2016). Analisis soal tes hasil belajar high order thinking skills (hots) matematika materi pecahan untuk kelas 5 materi dasar. Jurnal Penelitian (Edisi Khusus PGSD), 20(2), 123–131.

Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2003). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Aryawan, P., Sulastri, M., & Seeknayasa, G. (2014). Pengaruh konseling kelompok dengan pelatihan tutor sebaya terhadap kepemimpinan peserta didik peserta smansa conseling club (ssc) di sma negeri 1 singaraja. E-Journal Undiksha Jurusan Bimbingan Konseling, 2, 1–10.

Asrul, A., Ananda, R., & Rosnita, R. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Citapustaka Media.

Dewi, D. A. N. N. (2018). Modul uji validitas dan hormonal. In Universitas Diponegoro (Issue October). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328600462

Djaali, D., & Mulyono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. Grasindo.

Gable, R. K. (1986). Instrument development in affective domain. Klawer-Nichoff Publishing.

Gee, P. M., Clift, A., Osteyee, J., Katz, E. B. P. C. R., & Collingridge, D. (2023). Fall risk instrument for pediatric behavioral health patients (BHFR-P©): A validity and reliability study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 69, 118–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2023.02.011

Gül, Ş., Avşar, P., Karadağ, A., Karaçay, P., & Gökmen, D. (2023). The validity and reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument: A methodological study. Journal of Tissue Viability, 32(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.003

Gunada, I. W., Sahidu, H., & Sutrio, S. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan sikap ilmiah mahapeserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 1(1), 38–46.

https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v1i1.233

Hariyanto, Y., & B, I. G. P. A. (2015). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran tipe talking chips terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada kompotensi dasar memahami model atom bahasan semi konduktur di smk negeri 1 jetis mojokerto. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 4(3), 999–1005.

Herndon, R. M. (2006). Handbook of neurologic rating scales. 2nd ed., Demos Medical Publishing.

Hodges, D., & Burchell, N. (2003). Business graduate competencies: Employers’ views on importance and performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 4(2), 16–22.

Istiyono, E. (2020). Penilaian dan analisis hasil belajar fisika. UNY Press.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No. 65 tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2009.10.012

Kemendikbud. (2018). Permendikbud RI Nomor 37 tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Kholed, S. N. S., Maon, S. N., & Hassan, N. M. (2021). Reliability and validity of the inter-professional collaboration practice instrument. Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, 24(October 2019), 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2021.100450

Kim, H. Y., Nho, J. H., Kim, J. Y., & Kim, S. R. (2021). Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module. Geriatric Nursing, 42(2), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.10.006

Kim, M. J., McKenna, H., Park, C. G., Ketefian, S., Park, S. H., Galvin, K., & Burke, L. (2020). Global assessment instrument for quality of nursing doctoral education with a research focus: Validity and reliability study. Nurse Education Today, 91, 104475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104475

Ko, M. M., Lee, M. S., Birch, S., & Lee, J. A. (2017). The reliability and validity of instruments measuring pattern identification in Korean medicine: A systematic review. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 15(September), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2017.09.005

Lasater, M. E., Beebe, M., Warren, N. E., Winch, P. J., Soucko, F., Keita, M., Doumbia, S., & Murray, S. M. (2022). Reliability and validity of a perinatal depression screening instrument in rural Mali. SSM - Mental Health, 2(September 2021), 100059.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100059

Mentzel, T. Q., Lieverse, R., Levens, A., Mentzel, C. L., Tenback, D. E., Bakker, P. R., Daanen, H. A. M., & van Harten, P. N. (2016). Reliability and validity of an instrument for the assessment of bradykinesia. Psychiatry Research, 238, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.011

Nurhasanah, N. (2018). Pengembangan tes untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran mahapeserta didik mata kuliah geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan PEPATUDZU, 14(1), 62.

https://doi.org/10.35329/fkip.v14i1.186

Pakaya, A. (2022). Meningkatkan kemampuan guru dalam menyusun tes hasil belajar melalui supervisi akademik di sdn no. 93 kota utara kota gorontalo. Jurnal Pendidikan Masyarakat Dan Pengabdian, 02(93), 931–938. http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/dikmas/article/view/1513

Permendikbud. (2022). Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Permendikbudristek No 21 tahun 2022. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Riset Dan Teknologi. https://www.gurusumedang.com/2022/06/standar-penilaian-

pendidikan.html

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147.

Pop, C., & Khampirat, B. (2019). Self-assessment instrument to measure the competencies of Namibian graduates: Testing of validity and reliability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60(December 2018), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.004

Rahman, A. A., & Nasryah, C. E. (2019). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. In Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

Roldán-Merino, J., Farrés-Tarafa, M., Estrada-Masllorens, J. M.,

Hurtado-Pardos, B., Miguel-Ruiz, D., Nebot-Bergua, C., Insa-Calderon, E., Grané-Mascarell, N., Bande-Julian, D., Falcó-Pergueroles, A. M.,

Lluch-Canut, M. T., & Casas, I. (2019). Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the “Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI).” Nurse Education in Practice, 35(December 2018), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.12.007

Sahriani, S., Palloan P, A. A. (2019). Analisis kesesuaian kompetensi dasar dengan pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 15(2), 10–17.

Sawitri, D., & Rahayu, E. M. (2018). Modul PKT. 08 - Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Kemenristek.

Shirali, G., Shekari, M., & Angali, K. A. (2018). Assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems. Safety and Health at Work, 9(3), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.010

Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293

Sugiyono, S. (2012). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bumi Aksara.

Susetyo, B. (2015). Prosedur penyusunan dan analisis tes untuk penilaian hasil belajar bidang kognitif. PT Refika Aditama.

’ulum, M. (2016). Uji Validitas dan Uji Reliabilitas (1st ed.). www.stikeswch-malang.ac.id

Wahyudi, W., Arafah K., & Khaeruddin, K. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen berbasis keterampilan-keterampilan abad ke-21. Seminar Nasional Fisika, 1–4.

Winkel, W. S. (1996). Psikologi pengajaran. PT Grasindo.

Wulff, N. B., Møller, P. R., Christensen, K. B., Pedersen, S. G., Wessel, I., Dalton, S. O., & Homøe, P. (2021). The Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) Instrument: Cross-cultural translation and test of validity and reliability of the danish version. Journal of Voice, 35(5), 806.e7-806.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.01.010

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan realibiltas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/jorpres.v13i1.12884

Zainuddin, M., Syam, Y., & Yusuf, S. (2020). Translation of self-efficacy scale (SCSES) stoma care instruments Indonesia version: Test validity and reliability. Enfermeria Clinica, 30, 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.133

Zhao, M., Rodriguez, M. A., Wang, B., Santa Ana, E. J., Friedberg, J., Fang, Y., Allegrante, J. P., & Natarajan, S. (2021). Validity and reliability of a short self-efficacy instrument for hypertension treatment adherence among adults with uncontrolled hypertension. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(7), 1781–1788.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.029

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v8i1.10217