IoT Light Switch Project in Smart Home to Enhance Concept Mastery of Vocational High School Students

Catur Wulandari; Endang Purwaningsih; Parno Parno

doi:10.20527/jipf.v8i3.13188

IoT Light Switch Project in Smart Home to Enhance Concept Mastery of Vocational High School Students

Catur Wulandari, Endang Purwaningsih, Parno Parno

Abstract

This research aims to improve vocational school students' mastery of dynamic electricity through STEM-PJBL learning in the TPACK framework. This dynamic electrical material is important for vocational school students in Technology and Information expertise because it is the basis for productive vocational learning at the next level. Facts in the field show that the mastery of the concept of vocational school students still needs to improve. Thus, to increase the mastery of the concept, a web-based interactive media, Google Sites, was used with a student project to prototype an IoT light switch on a smart home. This study is a pseudo-experimental research with a pretest-posttest group design with 32 students in class X TJKT. The results of this study show that STEM-PJBL learning in the TPACK framework can significantly increase concept mastery (sig 2-tailed < 0.05) with Ngain by 0.59.

Keywords

concept mastery; dynamic electricity; STEM-PJBL; TPACK

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, L., DR, K., PW, A., KA, C., Mayer, R., PR, P., Raths, J., & MC, W. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.

Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The ınfluence of project-based STEM (PjbL-STEM) applications on the development of 21st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), Article 4.

Budiarti, R. S., Harlis, & Siburian, J. (2023). Development of STEM-based PjBL e-student worksheet to foster character building. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9818–9828. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.6169

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Springer Science & Business Media.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6

Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7

Chang, C.-C., & Chen, Y.-K. (2022). Educational values and challenges of i-STEM project-based learning: A mixed-methods study with data-transformation design. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976724

Chen, Y. L., Pan, P. R., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Correcting misconceptions on electronics: Effects of a simulation-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 212–227.

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Sixth edition). Pearson.

Dolgopolovas, V., & Dagiene, V. (2024). Competency-based TPACK approaches to computational thinking and integrated STEM: A conceptual exploration. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, n/a, e22788. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22788

Fahruddin, A. F., Adiarta, A., & Santiyadnya, N. (2022). Pengembangan media pembelajaran pengaplikasian ardunio sebagai media pengenalan dan pengukuran komponen elektronika berbasis mikrokontroler arduino. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro Undiksha, 11(1), 24–35.

Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x

Freese, M., Teichrew, A., Winkelmann, J., Erb, R., Ullrich, M., & Tremmel, M. (2023). Measuring teachers’ competencies for a purposeful use of augmented reality experiments in physics lessons. Frontiers in Education, 8.

https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1180266

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2002). Educational research: An introduction (Seventh Edition). Pearson Education.

Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. American Educational Research Methodology.

Halawa, S., Lin, T.-C., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2024). Exploring instructional design in K-12 STEM education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00503-5

Hayat, M. S., Sumarno, S., Yunus, M., & Nada, N. Q. (2023). STEAM-based “IPAS Project” learning as a study of the implementation of the independent curriculum in vocational schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 12139–12148. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6005

Higley, K. A. (2017). Education vs. training: Does it matter? Health Physics, 112(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000622

Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20386

Jing, Y., Wang, C., Chen, Z., Shen, S., & Shadiev, R. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of studies on technology-supported learning environments: Hot topics and frontier evolution. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1185–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12934

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Latifah, N. U., & Novia, H. (2019). Mengintegrasikan arduino dalam pengajaran fisika pada pembelajaran listrik dinamis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika 5.0, 0, 144–153.

Laumann, D., Fischer, J. A., Stürmer-Steinmann, T. K., Welberg, J., Weßnigk, S., & Neumann, K. (2024). Designing e-learning courses for classroom and distance learning in physics: The role of learning tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010107.

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010107

Lehane, L. (2020). Experiential Learning—David A. Kolb. 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_17

Lim, M. L. W., Wong, S. Y., & Ding, C. S. (2024). Challenges of industrial revolution 4.0: Quantity surveying students’ perspectives. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(6), 2496–2512. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2022-0636

Liu, X., & Gao, Y. (2021). New era, new choice: The implementation path of the “general-to-vocational student roughly equivalent” policy in high school education. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 10(1), 1323–1340. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.21.or053

Mo, F., & Guo, H. (2024). Empirical research on online active learning intention in the post-pandemic era in china. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 18(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v18i01/67-91

Morales, M. P. E. (2022). Experiences and practices of STEM Teachers through the lens of TPACK. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.1120

Musliman, A., & Kasman, U. (2022). Efektivitas model inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatih. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 02(01), 48–53.

Nyirahabimana, P., Minani, E., Nduwingoma, M., & Kimeza, I. (2024). University students dataset related to achievement, classroom practices, perceptions and attitudes of multimedia-based learning quantum physics (No. 12:4). F1000Research.

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128013.2

Prastiyan, R., Purwaningsih, R., & Koes-H, S. (2021). Peningkatan penguasan konsep siswa melalui pembelajaran STEM-PjBL dan TPACK pada materi fluida statis. JRPF(Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika), 6(2), 94–100.

Purwaningsih, E., Sari, S. P., Sari, A. M., & Suryadi, A. (2020). The effect of STEM-PjBL and discovery learning on improving students’ problem-solving skills of impulse and momentum topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26432

Salsabillah, S., Safirah, S., & Sudarti, S. (2018). Analisis penguasaan konsep – konsep fisika pokok bahasan gelombang elektromagnetik pada siswa kelas xii sma. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, 3, 259.

Shafie, H., Abd Majid, F., & Ismail, I. S. (2019). Technological pedagogical skills for teaching technical subject in school. Online Journal For TVET Practitioners, 4(1), 4–9.

Sigit, D. V., Ristanto, R. H., & Mufida, S. N. (2022). Integration of project-based e-learning with STEAM: An innovative solution to learn ecological concept. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1532a

Suari, M. (2017). Pemanfatan arduino nano dalam perancangan media pembelajaran fisika. Natural Science Journal, 3(1), 474–480.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. In Bandung Alfabeta Bandung.

Sukarno, & Widdah, M. El. (2020). The effect of students’ metacognition and digital literacy in virtual lectures during the covid-19 pandemic on achievement in the “methods and strategies on physics learning” course. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25332

Suryadi, A. and K. E. (2021). Teori dan Implementasi Pendidikan STEM.

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M.,

Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D.,

Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525

Wannapiroon, P., Nilsook, P., Techakosit, S., & Kamkhuntod, S. (2021). STEM literacy of students in vocational education. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(4), 527–549. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.253

Weng, A. K.-W., Chang, H.-Y., Lai, K.-K., & Lin, Y.-B. (2024). Topic modeling on peer interaction in online and mobile learning of higher education: 1993–2022. Education Sciences, 14(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080867

Winarno, A., & Maulana, A. (2020). The implementation of project based learning (PjBL) based on STEM: A Reflection of concept and reality within learning process in business department of vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 6(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.17977/um003v6i22020p078

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v8i3.13188