Open Inquiry Module on Energy Transformation to Improve Creative Thinking and Collaboration

Putri Dian Lestari; Haeruddin Haeruddin; Nurjannah Nurjannah; Jusman Mansyur; Amiruddin Kade

doi:10.20527/jipf.v9i2.14692

Open Inquiry Module on Energy Transformation to Improve Creative Thinking and Collaboration

Putri Dian Lestari, Haeruddin Haeruddin, Nurjannah Nurjannah, Jusman Mansyur, Amiruddin Kade

Abstract

The current energy transformation module does not support the application of the open inquiry approach, thus inhibiting students' skills. So, this study aims to develop an open inquiry energy transformation practicum module to improve creative thinking and collaboration skills. The development method used is research and development with the ADDIE model. Limited time and resources were considered, so a more in-depth evaluation was conducted in a follow-up study to evaluate the long-term impact of this module. The research was conducted at SMP IT Qurrota A'yun Palu in November 2024. The sample used was 1 class, namely class VIII D, totaling 30 students. The instruments used are tests, observations, and questionnaires. The test is in the form of a description to measure creative thinking skills. The researchers use observations to assess collaboration skills. Questionnaires for peer assessment of collaboration skills. Questionnaires are also for teacher and learner responses. The study found that the module's validation was 82.15%, categorised as valid. Teacher and student responses were 86.36% and 86.08%, respectively, in the very feasible category. Small group trials rated 92.01%, which was also very feasible, with some suggestions. Large group trials showed that the module improved creative thinking skills with an N-gain of 59% in the moderate category. Collaboration skills were assessed with an observer sheet (85.34% in very collaborative) and peer assessment (73.41% in collaborative). In conclusion, the module is valid and feasible for enhancing creative thinking and collaboration skills.

Keywords

Creative thinking skills; Collaboration skills; Energy transformation; Open inquiry; Practicum module

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abacioglu, C. S., Volman, M., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ multicultural attitudes and perspective taking abilities as factors in culturally responsive teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12328

Abaniel, A. (2021). Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st century skills and learning attitudes through an open inquiry learning model in Physics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1004

Aflah, N. H. T., & Sabrina, T. r. (2024). Media pictorial riddle untuk pembelajaran ipa berbasis inquiry untuk melatih kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa smp. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA.

Alfitriyani, N., Pursitasari, I. D., & Kurniasih, S. (2021). Profile of students’ critical and creative thinking skills. In 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020) (pp. 328-335). Atlantis

Press.https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.069

Biazus, M. de O., & Mahtari, S. (2022). The impact of project-based learning (pjbl) model on secondary students’ creative thinking skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.752

Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718818721

Cai, B., Mainhood, L. A., Groome, R., Laverty, C., & McLean, A. (2021). Student behavior in undergraduate physics laboratories: Designing experiments. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020109

Candra, R. A., Presetya, A., & Hartati, R. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif peserta didik melalui penerapan blended project-based learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(2), 2437–2446.

Cirkony, C. (2023). Flexible, creative, constructive, and collaborative: the makings of an authentic science inquiry task. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1440–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2213384

DeStefano, P. R., & Widenhorn, R. (2024). Open-inquiry opens doors to intriguing optics experiments at home: A case study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010108

Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systemic design of instruction. Allyn and Bacon. .

Doucette, D., Clark, R., & Singh, C. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward experimental physics in a conceptual inquiry-based introductory physics lab. Canadian Journal of Physics, 100(6), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2021-0121

Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., Maio, S., & Doherty, M. (2021). Four text‐mining methods for measuring elaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.471

Goldsack, J. C., Coravos, A., Bakker, J. P., Bent, B., Dowling, A. V., Fitzer-Attas, C., Godfrey, A., Godino, J. G., Gujar, N., Izmailova, E., Manta, C., Peterson, B., Vandendriessche, B., Wood, W. A., Wang, K. W., & Dunn, J. (2020). Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs). Npj Digital Medicine, 3(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0260-4

Gomez-del, R. T., & Rodriguez, J. (2022). Design and assessment of a project-based learning in a laboratory for integrating knowledge and improving engineering design skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 40, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.04.002

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw Hill Book Company.

Gunada, I. W., Busyairi, A., & Ayub, S. (2023). Pelatihan Penerapan Alat Peraga Berbasis STEM Untuk Meningkatkan Sikap IlmiahSiswa di SMP Negeri 1 Aikmel Lombok Timur. Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 2655–5263.

Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Dept of Physics Indiana University.

Handayani, S. A., Rahayu, Y. S., & Agustini, R. (2021). Students’ creative thinking skills in biology learning: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Leung, K. H., Marashdeh, W., Wray, R., Ashrafinia, S., Pomper, M. G., Rahmim, A., & Jha, A. K. (2020). A physics-guided modular deep-learning based automated framework for tumor segmentation in PET. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65(24), 245032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab8535

López Martínez, O., Lorca Garrido, A. J., & de Vicente-Yagüe Jara, M. I. (2024). Indicators of verbal creative thinking: results of a Delphi panel. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397861

Luthfia, S. (2024). The enhancement of creative thinking skill using creative problem solving learning model. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 3(1), 107–118.

Meitiyani, M., Elvianasti, M., Maesaroh, M., Irdalisa, I., & Amirullah, G. (2022). Analysis of students creative thinking ability in environmental problem solving. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1983–1994. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1629

Muhamad D. N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Syed Abdul Azziz, S. S. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 43, 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601

Newman, S., & Park R, M. (2024). A teaching practicum model for constructing cogenerative dialogue amongst preservice teachers to improve science teaching. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2024.344

Nurfitasari, C., Suzanti, F., & Azhar, A. (2024). Validation of electronic module based on bounded inquiry laboratory on excretion system. Journal on Education, 6(4), 19664–19672. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.5894

Nuri, L. N. N., Wahyuni, S., & Ridlo, Z. R. (2023). Development of an android-based mobile learning module to improve the students critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 4991–4998. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2944

O’Reilly, M., Levine, D., & Law, E. (2021). Applying a ‘digital ethics of care’ philosophy to understand adolescents’ sense of responsibility on social media. Pastoral Care in Education, 39(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1774635

Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & de Vries, M. J. (2023). Integrating argumentation in physics inquiry: A design and evaluation study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020170. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020170

Pöntinen, S., Kärkkäinen, S., Pihlainen, K., & Räty-Záborszky, S. (2019). Pupil-generated questions in a collaborative open inquiry. Education Sciences, 9(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020156

Pulgar, J., Fahler, V., & Spina, A. (2021). Investigating how university students collaborate to compose physics problems through structured tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 010120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010120

Song, Y., Cao, J., Yang, Y., & Looi, C. K. (2022). Mapping primary students’ mobile collaborative inquiry-based learning behaviours in science collaborative problem solving via learning analytics. International Journal of Educational Research, 114.

Sun, C., Shute, V. J., Stewart, A. E. B., Beck-White, Q., Reinhardt, C. R., Zhou, G., Duran, N., & D’Mello, S. K. (2022). The relationship between collaborative problem solving behaviors and solution outcomes in a game-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107120

Syarifatul, L. (2024). Enhancement of creative thinking skill using creative problem solving learning model. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 3(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i1.197

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21 st Century Skills : Learning For Life our Time. Jhon wiley and sons.

Widyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Pustaka Belajar.

Xu, W., Geng, F., & Wang, L. (2022). Relations of computational thinking to reasoning ability and creative thinking in young children: Mediating role of arithmetic fluency. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101041

Zulaiha, F., & Kusuma, D. (2020). Pengembangan modul berbasis stem untuk siswa smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2182

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v9i2.14692