Mapping the Evolution Classroom to Experience: A Global Bibliometric Analysis of Experiential Learning in Physics Education

Thomas Enggar Dwi Prasetyo; I Made Astra; Teguh Budi Prayitno; Firmanul Catur Wibowo; Iwan Sugihartono

doi:10.20527/jipf.v10i2.18440

Mapping the Evolution Classroom to Experience: A Global Bibliometric Analysis of Experiential Learning in Physics Education

Thomas Enggar Dwi Prasetyo, I Made Astra, Teguh Budi Prayitno, Firmanul Catur Wibowo, Iwan Sugihartono

Abstract

The integration of traditional classroom instruction and hands-on experience through experiential learning in physics education requires systematic mapping to understand its research development. This study aims to: (1) analyze publication trends and geographic distribution; (2) identify influential journals, authors, and collaboration networks; (3) determine dominant research themes through keyword analysis; and (4) propose future research directions. Data were retrieved from the Scopus database (2020–2025), comprising 30 sources and 54 documents. A quantitative bibliometric method was employed using RStudio with the Bibliometrix package to examine publication trends, collaboration patterns, and thematic structures. The findings show a significant increase in publications in 2024 (15 documents), with the United States contributing the largest share (64.4%). Collaboration networks remain fragmented across 14 clusters. Thematic analysis identifies “educational innovation” as a motor theme, while “physics education” appears as a basic yet relatively isolated theme. Overall, experiential learning research in physics education is growing rapidly and shows strong potential for technology integration. These findings imply that researchers, educators, and curriculum developers need to promote stronger international collaboration, develop more context-specific experiential learning models, and integrate emerging technologies to enhance the relevance and effectiveness of physics education. However, broader international collaboration and more contextualized approaches are needed to strengthen future research development.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Classroom engagement; Experiential learning; Physics education; Science education

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602.

https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602

Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018

Bittermann, A., McNamara, D., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2023). The landscape of research on prior knowledge and learning: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9

Bowen, A., Reid, D., & Koretsky, M. (2014). Development of interactive virtual laboratories to help students learn difficult concepts in thermodynamics. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 24.426.1-24.426.26. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20317

Bozkurt, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). Trends and patterns in distance education (2014–2019): A synthesis of scholarly publications and a visualization of the intellectual landscape. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5381

Brewe, E. (2008). Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 76(12), 1155–1160. doi:10.1119/1.2983148

Carpenter, C. R., Cone, D. C., & Sarli, C. C. (2014). Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Academic emergency medicine, 21(10), 1160-1172.

Chinaka, T. W. (2021). The effect of PhET simulation vs.

phenomenon-based experiential learning on students’ integration of motion along two independent axes in projectile motion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(2), 185-196.

Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From stem to steam: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 5(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458

Crompton, J. L. (2025). Beyond metrics: Shifting measures of research impact from citations and journal rankings to meaningful impacts on society. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(5), 1449-1464.

Czaplinski, I., & Fielding, A. L. (2020). Developing a contextualised blended learning framework to enhance medical physics student learning and engagement. Physica Medica, 72, 22-29.

Darman, D. R., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., & Wibowo, F. C. (2024). Development and validation of scientific inquiry literacy instrument (sili) using rasch measurement model. Education Sciences, 14(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030322

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Etkina, E., Brookes, D. T., & Planinsic, G. (2019). Investigative science learning environment: When learning physics mirrors doing physics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-2571/ab3ebd

Fiandrino, S., Tonelli, A., & Devalle, A. (2022). Sustainability materiality research: A systematic literature review of methods, theories and academic themes. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 19(5), 665–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-07-2021-0141

Gan, Y., Li, D., Robinson, N., & Liu, J. (2022). Practical guidance on bibliometric analysis and mapping knowledge domains methodology – A summary. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 56, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2022.102203

Gjerde, V., Holst, B., & Kolstø, S. D. (2021). Integrating effective learning strategies in basic physics lectures: A thematic analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 010124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010124

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2011). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. Research in Learning Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v3i2.9606

Guleria, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019. Library Hi Tech, 39(4), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2020-0218

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2020). Mapping the landscape and structure of research on education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947

Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., Prahani, B. K., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Research trends on ethnoscience based learning through bibliometric analysis: contributed to physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2110(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2110/1/012026

Himelboim, I., Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Espina, C. (2017). Classifying twitter topic-networks using social network analysis. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 2056305117691545. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545

Jordi, R. (2011). Reframing the concept of reflection: Consciousness, experiential learning, and reflective learning practices. Adult education quarterly, 61(2), 181-197.

Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Okan, B. (2025). Nature of science and domain-specificity: Investigating the coverage of nature of science in physics, chemistry and biology curricula across grade levels. International Journal of Science Education, 47(5), 697–727. doi:10.1080/09500693.2024.2348822

Kim, R. E. (2020). Is global governance fragmented, polycentric, or complex? The state of the art of the network approach. International Studies Review, 22(4), 903–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz052

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2011). The kolb learning style inventory- version 4.0.

Kumar, R. (2025). Bibliometric analysis: Comprehensive insights into tools, techniques, applications, and solutions for research excellence. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202535k

Lewis, L. H., & Williams, C. J. (1994). Experiential learning: Past and present. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1994(62), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719946203

Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., Park, H.-W., & Adams, J. (2013). International collaboration in science: The global map and the network. El Profesional de La Informacion, 22(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.ene.12

Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2015). How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 11(1), 010115.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010115

Oprea, M., & Miron, C. (2013). Mobile phones in the modern teaching of physics. Romanian reports in Physics, 66(4), 1236-1252.

Peşman, H., Arı, Ü., Karakaya Cirit, D., & Ayazgök, B. (2025). Effect of amount of guidance in inquiry-based physics laboratory on conceptual understanding and metacognitive awareness. Science & Education, 34, 3667–3687. doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00595-z

Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Suprapto, N., Irwanto, I., & Kurtuluş, M. A. (2024). Mapping research on scientific creativity: A bibliometric review of the literature in the last 20 years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101495

Stallings, J., Vance, E., Yang, J., Vannier, M. W., Liang, J., Pang, L., ... & Wang, G. (2013). Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(24), 9680-9685.

Tembrevilla, G., Phillion, A., & Zeadin, M. (2024). Experiential learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(1), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20575

Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020114

Van Den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van Der Veen, J., Van De Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347

Watson, E., & Thomas, G. (2024). Using continua to analyze qualitative data investigating epistemic beliefs about physics knowledge: Visualizing beliefs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010106.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010106

Wibowo, F. C., Darman, D. R., Guntara, Y., & Nulhakim, L. (2024). Unveil creative thinking in the physics education: Bibliometric analysis and literature review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3116 (1), 070018.

Wibowo, F. C., Darman, D. R., Salim, F., & Prahani, B. K. (2025). Knowledgeable integration hybrid ai joins augmented reality and science literacy: Prospects and challenges. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102566.

Wibowo, F. C., Prahani, B. K., Kurniawan, B. R., & Brata, W. W. W. (2024). Challenges of STEM approach in physics learning: A bibliometric analysis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3116(1), 070017.

Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Darman, D. R., Ruhiat, Y., Denny, Y. R., Suherman, & Fatah, A. (2016). Microscopic virtual media (mvm) in physics learning: case study on students understanding of heat transfer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 739, 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012044

Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Darman, D. R., Faizin, M. N., Wiyanto, Supriyatman, Permanasari, A., Kaniawati, I., Setiawan, W., Karyanto, Y., Linuwih, S., Fatah, A., Subali, B., Hasani, A., & Hidayat, S. (2017). Effectiveness of dry cell microscopic simulation (dcms) to promote conceptual understanding about battery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 877(1), 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/877/1/012009

Yan, L., & Zhiping, W. (2023). Mapping the literature on academic publishing: a bibliometric analysis on wos. Sage Open, 13(1), 21582440231158562. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158562

Yao, J. (2023). Exploring experiential learning: Enhancing secondary school chemistry education through practical engagement and innovation. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 22, 475–484. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v22i.12508

Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): Towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2022-0090

Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14513–14545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v10i2.18440