Building an Understanding of the Concept of Heat Through the Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning with Formative Assessment
Abstract
The students' understanding of temperature, heat, and thermal equilibrium remains inadequate, necessitating an educational strategy to enhance their scientific understanding. This study seeks to enhance students' understanding of concepts by employing guided inquiry learning in conjunction with formative assessment on thermal material. The research employed a mixed methods strategy, utilizing quantitative data from concept understanding exams and qualitative data from interviews. Quantitative analysis encompassed descriptive statistics, normalized gain (N-Gain) computations, and independent samples t-tests, and qualitative data was examined through content analysis methodologies. The study's results indicated a significantly greater enhancement in conceptual understanding in the experimental group relative to the control group. The N-Gain value for the experimental group was 0.69 (moderate category), but the control group attained just 0.25 (low category). The data satisfy the statistical requirements, specifically normal distribution (Sig > 0.05) and homogeneity (Sig = 0.406). The t-test results indicated a significant difference between the two courses (t = 73.761; p < 0.001), demonstrating that guided inquiry learning with formative evaluation substantially enhances conceptual understanding. This study's theoretical implications suggest that integrating guided inquiry learning with formative assessment can enhance students' conceptual understanding through scientific investigations and ongoing feedback. The finding corroborates the constructivist approach, which underscores the significance of active learning experiences and cognitive interactions in fostering a more precise and comprehensive conceptual understanding.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ariza, F., & Widodo, W. (2022). Implementasi inkuiri terbimbing pada materi kalor dan perpindahannya untuk meningkatkan kualitas proses dan hasil belajar. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v3i1.989
Asfiya, N., Razi, P., Hidayati, & Sari, S. Y. (2024). Development of e-module for independent learning of physics material based on independent curriculum. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.5.2100
Aulia, S. T., Bektiarso, S., & Subiki. (2022). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing disertai e-lkpd terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa sma pada materi suhu dan kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online, 10(3), 53–58.
Ayu, H. D., Chusniyah, D. A., Kurniawati, M. P., Purwanti, P. F., Lukitawanti, S. D., & Putri, A. N. (2024). Problem Based learning (PBL) as an effective solution to enhance understanding of physics concepts: Systematic literature review. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 2(2).
https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v2i2.29
Brown, B., & Singh, C. (2021). Student understanding of the first law
and second law of thermodynamics. European Journal of Physics, 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac18b4
Brundage, M. J., Meltzer, D. E., & Singh, C. (2024). Investigating introductory and advanced students’ difficulties with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics using a validated instrument. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.020110
Charli, M. S., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L. (2022). Learning how research design methods work: a review of creswell’s research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901
Creswell, J. W., & Inoue, M. (2025). A process for conducting mixed methods data analysis. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 26(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.736
Doucette, D., Clark, R., & Singh, C. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward experimental physics in a conceptual inquiry-based introductory physics lab. Canadian Journal of Physics, 100(6), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2021-0121
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Erceg, N., Jelovica, L., Hrepić, Z., Mešić, V., Karuza, M., & Aviani, I. (2021). University students’ conceptual understanding of microscopic models of electrical and thermal conduction in solids. European Journal of Physics, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abf5eb
Harefa, D. F., & Yurnetti, Y. (2023). Effect of the guided inquiry learning model assisted by scientific worksheets on student’s competence. Physics Learning and Education, 1(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i2.25
Hidayat, R. K., Sahidu, H., & Gunada, I. W. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri terbimbing terintegritas dengan karakter untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i2.462
Jacalan, L., & A. Castillo, A. (2023). Effect of Inquiry-based learning approach on the students’ performance in Physics. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), (June), 230–233. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i3p121
Jufriadi, A., Ayu, H. D., Huda, C., & Pratama, O. D. (2025). Guided inquiry with formative assessment to reduce naive impetus in learning newton’s first law. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 10(2), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v10i1.28135
Jufriadi, A., Ayu, H. D., Kumalasari, T., Kusumawati, A. D., Alatas, F., & Budiyono, A. (2024). Maximizing problem-solving abilities through hybrid problem-based learning with formative assessment. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 9(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v9i2.34395
Jufriadi, A., Rahayu, W. A., & Ayu, H. D. (2022). The effectiveness of hybrid guided inquiry for optimizing hots and communication skills in circular motion concepts. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.4134
Kibirige, I. (2021). Exploring the prevalence of misconceptions regarding heat and temperature among grade nine natural science learners. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(3), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i3.47258
Kotsis, K. T., Stylos, G., Pinelopi Houssou, & Kamaratos, M. (2023). Students’ perceptions of the heat and temperature concepts: A comparative study between primary, secondary, and university levels. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.577
Lichtenberger, A., Hofer, S. I., Stern, E., & Vaterlaus, A. (2024). Enhanced conceptual understanding through formative assessment: results of a randomized controlled intervention study in physics classes. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 37(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-024-09445-6
Masara, A., Gunantiani, J. M., & Rohman, S. M. (2024). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam memahami konsep asas black pada pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 4(2), 205-214.
Muliyani, R., Suhandi, A., & Prima, E. C. (2024). Unveiling heat and temperature misconceptions: A multilocation study on first-year college students in indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 361-371.
Nabila, P., & Wahyuni, V. (2020). Implementation of formative assessment in physics learning to improve students' conceptual understanding. jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika, 8(3), 426.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Pals, F. F. B., Tolboom, J. L. J., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2023). Formative assessment strategies by monitoring science students’ problem-solving skill development. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00296-9
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Planinic, M., Jelicic, K., Matejak Cvenic, K., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2024). Effect of an inquiry-based teaching sequence on secondary school students’ understanding of wave optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 10156. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010156
Puspitasari, Z., & Setiaji, B. (2023). Revitalisasi pembelajaran fisika melalui eksplorasi konsep metode inkuiri terbimbing. Journal of Physics Education and Science, 1(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/physics.v1i1.133
Putri, H. N. P. A., Wadilkh, S. F., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. (2021). The impact of simulation based formative assessment on student problem solving skill in learning newton law. Atlantis Press, 209(Ijcse), 310–316.
Rahayu, M., Asyhari, A., & Anjani, A. V. (2022). Scaffolding in guided inquiry learning with google classroom: Effect on physics conceptual understanding. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i2.48365
Ramadhani, D. P. (2021). Analisis penerapan asesmen formatif dalam pembelajaran ipa dan fisika : Literature review. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v11i2.172
Robertson, A. D., Goodhew, L. M., Bauman, L. C., Hansen, B., & Alesandrini, A. T. (2023). Identifying student conceptual resources for understanding physics: A practical guide for researchers. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020138
Septiya, Suhartono, & Dinata, P. A. C. (2023). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing untuk membangun literasi sains pada materi kalor kelas xi. Bahana Pendidikan: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.37304/bpjps.v5i1.8790
Staberg, R. L., Febri, M. I. M., Gjøvik, Ø., Sikko, S. A., & Pepin, B. (2023). Science teachers’ interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09401-2
Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Undergraduate physics students’ understanding of thermal phenomena in everyday life. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23023.
https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13406
Susilawati, S., Doyan, A., Hardjono, A., & Muliyadi, L. (2021). Development of physics learning media based on guided inquiry model to improve students’ concepts mastery and creativity. Journal of Science and Science Education, 2(2), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v2i2.711
Triyanti, M. (2022). Pengembangan modul biologi berbasis inkuiri pada materi pencemaran lingkungan untuk siswa sma kelas xi. Jurnal Perspektif Pendidikan, 16(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.31540/jpp.v16i2.1912
Younas, A., Fàbregues, S., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Generating metainferences in mixed methods research: A worked example in convergent mixed methods designs. Methodological Innovations, 16(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231188121
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v10i1.18184
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a creative commons attribution-share alike 4.0 international license
Statistics Counter |















